WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� In November 1979, a little over a week after student militants and took 52 American citizens hostage, President Jimmy Carter issued declaring a national emergency against Iran.
That order remains in effect today, in the weeks before last Thanksgiving by President Joe Biden, who noted then that 鈥渙ur relations with Iran have not yet normalized.鈥�
The Biden administration's declaration Aug. 4 of a frees up federal money and resources to fight a virus that has already infected people in the United States. But public health emergencies expire every 90 days, unless extended by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Those are different from national emergency declarations, which give presidents broad leeway to make policy and tap federal funds without congressional approval. That's what activists have clamored for to better fight , but Biden has held off despite in much of the world and at home.
鈥淭his is actually the true test of whether President Biden takes the climate crisis seriously,鈥� Karen Orenstein, climate director of Friends of the Earth. "There could not be a more crucial move.鈥�
Presidents have declared 76 national emergencies in the last nearly five decades, and 42 remain in effect, according to a at New York University Law School.
Biden has recently declared emergencies related to , while extending one on Mali. He's also issued them on and and , and individuals linked to the .
Such declarations stem mostly from the , which came after President Richard Nixon issued a series of them, including on currency restrictions and a national postal strike.
The law requires that those declarations automatically end after a year, unless the president orders a renewal. Congress can also end emergencies, but doing so effectively requires a veto-proof two-thirds vote, which has never happened.
鈥淭he origin of the law was clearly an attempt to set limits on presidential power," said Chris Edelson, author of 鈥淓mergency Presidential Power: From the Drafting of the Constitution to the War on Terror.鈥� "Before the actions passed, presidents could declare emergencies and no one really knew what it meant. And they stood for decades.鈥�
by President Harry S. Truman to combat communism globally in the context of the Korean War was still in effect in the 1970s, before the law.
Emergencies set since it took effect have similar, extended shelf lives, though. President George W. Bush's still stands. President Donald Trump declared in 2020 and Biden through at least February 2023.
Only once has Congress even discussed thwarting emergency declarations, Edelson said. That was in 2019, when 12 Senate Republicans joined Democrats on the U.S.-Mexico border and put $6 billion-plus from the military and other federal funds toward building a wall. Trump to preserve his border emergency declaration until Biden nixed it upon taking office.
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., warned during the wall funding fight that allowing Trump to what he wanted might let future Democratic presidents to do similar on the climate. Trump used a veto to keep his border emergency declaration in place until Biden nixed it upon taking office.
鈥淚t sets long-term precedents,鈥� Rubio told CN小蓝视频 in 2019. 鈥淭omorrow, the national security emergency might be climate change, so let鈥檚 seize fossil fuel plants or something.鈥�
That prediction hasn't yet proved prescient. Biden said last month that climate change 鈥渋s an emergency鈥� but didn't issue a declaration, which would have let him take major actions meant to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including limiting offshore drilling and U.S. oil exports.
With nearly $375 billion over a decade in climate change-fighting strategies as part of a , political pressure on him to do so may dissipate.
The White House hasn't said whether declaring a national climate emergency is now off the table. But it鈥檚 hard to imagine the administration imposing limits on oil and production after prices at the pump hit record highs. They have since fallen steady throughout the summer 鈥� a fact the .
Still, declaring a national climate emergency could let Biden move to fundamentally , a pledge that was a centerpiece of his 2020 presidential campaign. The president also has promised to slash the 鈥� a goal the budget package's climate provisions aren't enough to meet.
鈥淣ow more than ever we need to declare a climate emergency,鈥� said Cassidy DiPaola, a spokesperson for the Stop the Oil Profiteering campaign. She said the budget measure, known as the 鈥淚nflation Reduction Act,鈥� is 鈥渢otally packed with handouts to the fossil fuel industry.鈥�
鈥淥ur messaging to Biden is saying, 鈥橦ey, you need to fix what the IRA left out and what the IRA sacrificed,鈥� said DiPaola, who added that of the measure, 鈥淭his is Congress that passed IRA. President Biden has still made all of these climate commitments.鈥�
Delaying a national climate emergency declaration even this long, however, may undermine the core argument that a crisis is at hand.
鈥淭he real indicator that this doesn鈥檛 really meet the definition of an emergency as intended by the act 鈥� even though it鈥檚 not clearly defined 鈥� is that he waited," said Edelson, who is also a professor of government at American University in Washington, about climate concerns. "If it鈥檚 a real emergency, you act right away.鈥�
Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, countered that conservatives on the Supreme Court and in Congress have repeatedly defied popular opinion on top issues 鈥� underscoring Biden's need to act unilaterally.
鈥淓veryone grants the president can declare an emergency if there is an individual fire or hurricane. But when the entire planet is suffering heatwaves, unprecedented fires are rampant, and oceans are on the verge of flooding American cities, the president can鈥檛 declare that an existential climate emergency?,鈥� Green asked. "He clearly has the power and his grandchildren are depending on him to use it.鈥�
Will Weissert, The Associated Press
