WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected former President Donald Trump鈥檚 plea to step into the legal fight over the .
The justices did not otherwise comment in turning away Trump鈥檚 emergency appeal.
Trump had pressed the court on an issue relating to classified documents seized in the search authorized by a federal judge of Mar-a-Lago.
and permit an independent arbiter, or special master, to review the roughly 100 documents with classified markings that were taken in the Aug. 8 search of Mar-a-Lago.
The move Thursday appears to greatly reduce the potential impact of the special master process to the ongoing Justice Department criminal investigation into the classifed documents.
, which had been investigators鈥� primary goal. And the Supreme Court鈥檚 decision to stay out of the fray ensures that the special master will not have access to those same records as the FBI and Justice Department evaluate if criminal charges are merited.
A three-judge panel from the Atlanta-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit last month limited the special master鈥檚 review to the much larger tranche of non-classified documents. The judges, including two Trump appointees, sided with the Justice Department, which had argued there was no legal basis for the special master to conduct his own review of the classified records.
But Trump鈥檚 lawyers said in their application to the Supreme Court that it was essential for the special master to have access to the classified records to 鈥渄etermine whether documents bearing classification markings are in fact classified, and regardless of classification, whether those records are personal records or Presidential records.鈥�
The Justice Department said in a Supreme Court filing that Trump鈥檚 request had no merit.
The FBI says it seized roughly 11,000 documents, including about 100 with classification markings, during its search. The Trump team asked a judge in Florida, Aileen Cannon, to appoint a special master to do an independent review of the records.
Cannon subsequently assigned a veteran Brooklyn judge, Raymond Dearie, to review the records and segregate those that may be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. The Justice Department objected to Dearie鈥檚 ability to review the classified records, prompting the 11th Circuit to side with the department.
The department also is appealing Cannon鈥檚 entire ruling to the 11th Circuit.
___
Associated Press writer Eric Tucker contributed to this report.
Mark Sherman And Jessica Gresko, The Associated Press
